In a case of failure of the negotiations on a Brexit agreement, the British industry should not have an undue advantage and European competitors should not have an undue disadvantage. That`s why the biggest parliamentary Group in the European Parliament (EPP) supported by other political Groups tabled an amendment on the ETS directive. The European Parliament will discuss the Girling-report on the inclusion of aviation in the ETS on Monday and will vote on it on Wednesday. Given the raising concern that there is no comprehensive agreement with the UK government during the two years negotiation, MEPs take precautionary action. Allowances given to UK companies free should not be valid in the EU-ETS if those companies don`t have any more obligations under the ETS.
Read more: No advantage for British companies in climate policy in case of a hard Brexit
“The package leaflet shall finally be more understandable,” according to MEP Peter LIESE, health spokesperson of the EPP group in the European Parliament. Recently, the European Commission published a report on the issue. In the report, the Commission determines that there are problems with the intelligibility of the package leaflet, but without any concrete proposals to solve the problem. “I am very disappointed with that result. In 2012, the Commission committed to present a report in 2013 on how to improve the readability of the package leaflet.
We need a strong reaction - Europe and the rest of the world must continue their efforts - Protection of European industry even more important
“The decision of US-President Trump to step back from the Paris Agreement is regrettable but I am sure the Paris Agreement and the worldwide efforts to fight climate change will survive Donald Trump. Europe and the rest of the world need to give a strong reaction. We need to fulfil our commitments and continue the international process on climate mitigation. But on the other it´s now even more important to protect European industry when it´s producing according to the best possible standard” says MEP Peter Liese, spokesperson for environment of the EPP group in the European Parliament. Liese outlined its positions as follows: “The decision of Trump cannot be legally binding before 2020.
Read more: The decision is regrettable but the Paris Agreement will survive Trump
Peter Liese: good basis for negotiations with the Parliament. Important to apply same reduction target as for other industries. European Parliament will continue to put pressure on flights to and from third countries. ICAO deal: important step but falls short of efforts made by other sectors and the ambition of the Paris agreement
“The proposal is a solid basis for discussion in the Parliament, but we will examine it very closely and we will, in particular, continue to press for ambitious climate protection for intercontinental flights," said the environmental spokesman of the largest group in the European Parliament (EPP Christian Democrats) Peter Liese on the occasion of today’s Commission proposal about the further inclusion of aviation in the EU emission trading system (ETS).
Read more: New Commission proposal for climate protection in aviation