“The resistance of the Social Democrats against the European Commission's plans for bureaucracy reduction is irresponsible”, stated the environmental policy spokesperson of the largest group in the European Parliament (EPP Christian Democrats), Peter Liese, in light of a letter from the Social Democratic group to Ursula von der Leyen ahead of the adoption of a paper from the Commission on Wednesday.
The Commission intends to present a guiding document for the direction of policy in the newly started legislative period under the title "Competitiveness Compass." The focus is on strengthening competitiveness and reducing bureaucracy. In a few weeks, a so-called "Omnibus" is to follow, which will aim to reduce bureaucracy in four specific laws (sustainability reporting, supply chain law, taxonomy, and border adjustment mechanism CBAM). The responsible members of the Social Democratic group have already reached out to Ursula von der Leyen in a letter against this proposal. In doing so, they contradict leading Social Democrats in Europe, such as Olaf Scholz, who are calling for exactly this bureaucracy reduction in these laws.
Read more: Resistance of the Social Democrats Against Bureaucracy Reduction is Irresponsible
“Climate policy in times of Trump 2.0 will be extremely challenging, but if we do it right, we can still make progress,” said the environmental policy spokesperson of the largest political group in the European Parliament (EPP, Christian Democrats), MEP Dr. Peter Liese, on the occasion of Donald Trump's inauguration on Monday. “Trump is challenging us dramatically in terms of climate policy. I find it particularly worrying that major financial institutions have already terminated their membership in sustainability organizations before the inauguration. I have no doubt that Trump will withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, just as he did in his first term. Partly because of Trump and his expected anti-climate protection policy, I am unfortunately convinced that the 1.5 degree target cannot be maintained in the long term,” said Liese on Monday morning.
Next Wednesday, the European Commission intends to present a document with guidelines for the newly started mandate. A so-called Competitiveness Compass will outline the key foundations for policy and announce many individual measures. The main focus is on regaining competitiveness, reducing bureaucracy, and speeding up approval processes. "We urgently need this reorientation of European policy. Not only in Germany is the economy struggling. The member states in Germany, particularly the coalition government, bear a huge responsibility for the problems. However, the European Commission also needs to correct the direction of its policy. Many people, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, are suffering under excessive bureaucracy. In my view, this reorientation is by no means in conflict with the climate goals. I even see it as the last chance for us to be successful with our climate policy. Due to the many detailed rules and extremely long approval processes, acceptance of our climate goals is eroding within the European Union. If we do not address this, they will come under increasing attack. We as the EPP want to achieve the climate goals, but we want to do so with less bureaucracy, open technology, and while simultaneously strengthening competitiveness," said Peter Liese, the environmental policy spokesperson of the largest group in the European Parliament (EPP Christian Democrats).
“The 1.5-degree target cannot be achieved, also not in the long term”, said Peter Liese, climate policy spokesperson for the largest political group in the European Parliament (EPP, Christian Democrats), in light of the latest Copernicus publications. The EU’ observation service found that the global temperature in 2024 was more than 1.5 degrees higher than in the pre-industrial era. “Formally, the 1.5-degree target is calculated over a 20-year average and if all major polluters worldwide now drastically reduce their emissions in the short term, there is a theoretical chance of still achieving this target, but especially in view of Donald Trump's election and his announcements, I fear that this is unrealistic. Nevertheless, climate protection must remain a priority. In Paris, a strict 1.5-degree target was deliberately not set, instead the Agreement says that global warming must be limited to well below 2 degrees and every tenth of a degree counts in this challenge. We don't know exactly where the tipping points are that will make it impossible to control global warming for our children and grandchildren,” emphasized Liese.