“I strongly expect a positive recommendation of the EMA for the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine against Covid-19 for 12 to 15-year old youngsters“, said Peter Liese, EPP MEP and doctor who worked in the paediatric department of a hospital before being elected into the European Parliament. Liese said that the EMA has enough data to approve the vaccine for this age group and that he had encouraged the EMA’s Executive Director, Emer Cooke, to prioritize the decision without compromising on any diligence or safety precautions.
“Youngsters that belong to a risk group due to being affected by the down’s syndrome, serious lung diseases like cystic fibrosis, cardiac failure or severe obesity must be vaccinated as soon as possible because they have a higher risk to have a serious condition when infected. The question if other youngsters should be vaccinated must be discussed carefully, because although the risk for completely healthy youngsters is much lower than for elderly citizens, the risk still exists. Achieving herd immunity and allowing adults more freedoms should not be the motivation to vaccinate children. Herd immunity (or, as I prefer to say, community immunity) should be achieved by vaccinating as many adults as possible. We need to keep schools open and prioritize education even if children are not vaccinated”, Liese concluded.
"This is very good news for youngsters and their families and especially for young people who belong to risk groups including youngsters with serious lung disease, cancer or Down’s syndrome. Those should be vaccinated as soon as possible“, this was the reaction of the health spokesperson of the largest group in the European Parliament (EPP, Christian Democrats) Dr. med. Peter Liese after the FDA announced its approval of the BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for 12- to 15-year old youngsters.
The EMA originally planned the approval only for June. “I am very happy that the head of EMA Emer Cooke announced now that approval is possible this month. Last week I had the opportunity to talk to Emer Cooke and urged her for prioritizing this procedure. Of course, safety is essential, especially when it comes to children and youngsters. However, it is also a question of priorities. EMA is able to grant the original market licensing two weeks after receiving the application. That has been done for the approval of AstraZeneca, for example. I think that young people should be a priority for all of us”, said the doctor and MEP.
"It is important that the G20 Health Summit delivered concrete results and that as many people as possible around the world have the chance to be vaccinated," said the health spokesperson of the largest group in the European Parliament (EPP, Christian Democrats), Dr. Peter Liese. "The summit is overshadowed by the question of whether or not vaccine patents should be lifted.
The idea is supported by South Africa, India and recently also by the USA. However, the EU Member States and the European Commission are sceptical. In view of the pictures from India, it is clear that we must help quickly and a waiver of the patent rights must not be a taboo. But it is clear that intellectual property is important to support medical progress. I am convinced that BioNTech's vaccine would probably not exist if, in addition to the EU and federal governments, venture capitalists had not supported the technology and vaccine development in recent years. Moreover, the technology of the mRNA vaccine is so complicated that even if the patent was published, there would not be more vaccine available in the next few months. That is why I support the European Commission's policy.
The Environment Committee of the European Parliament voted today, Monday afternoon, on the agreement of the European climate law. A large majority voted in favour (52/24/4). Christian Democrats, Social Democrats, and the liberal Renew group voted in favour. The Left, the right-wing ID group and the Greens voted against. The law states that climate neutrality as a whole in the EU is legally binding the latest by 2050. The target for 2030 is set at 55%. This has always been the position of the Christian Democratic EPP Group from the starting point of the negotiations. Liese criticized the voting behaviour of the Greens. "We have reached a historic agreement. The whole law means a giant step for European and global climate protection. We are the first continent to actually make climate neutrality legally binding, and we will again significantly accelerate climate protection with the 2030 target. We need to cut greenhouse gases by more than 3% a year. Anyone who says that this target not ambitious does not know what they are talking about. It is a pity that the Greens are voting against the law together with the right-wing party," said the environment spokesperson of the biggest political group in the European Parliament (EPP, Christian Democrats) Dr Peter Liese.
Read more: Environment committee votes in favour of European climate law with large majority